Druvaa inSync v3.0 Nears Completion
By Milind on March 7th, 2009 under Druvaa inSync

As inSync 3.0 release nears completion and the action moves from development to release engineering, I get some time to reflect on how inSync has shaped up.
(Please let us know if you have any feedback for beta.)
Some factors proved very crucial in the development process -
Usability First
inSync team always kept usability ahead of everything else. Usability ensured that inSync features can be easily evaluated by prospective customers. A customer may or may not like a product, but that comes after she can evaluate it easily. No usability means no evaluations means no feedback and no sale. We would rather not have a feature than an unusable one.
Zero Baggage
inSync started as a disk-to-disk backup. It does not have any baggage that carries with a tape backup with disk-to-disk backup feature. We also tried not to pick non-core features along the way. If inSync picks up a new feature, be assured that Druvaa is very serious about it. We would rather have a small set of well deveoped features than a plathora of half cooked ones.
Release Early, Release Often (RERO)- The Apple Philosophy
inSync 1.0 was a small feature set, but a complete product. (Interestingly, a set of customers found that it meets all their requirements and continue to use it even today.) Note that RERO is not about the quality or usability of the product. It’s only about leaner releases, each with a small set of new features. RERO allowed us a rich customer feedback that helped us pick the next set of feature to focus on.
I’m not saying that we do not miss deadlines, but things are more predictable while dealing with a small set of features. RERO also implies seamless upgrades, which is an extra effort but much lesser than managing a big release. In essence, we would rather have a small release than a big one that never ships.
Team with Diverse Experience
Druvaa development team has engineers with extensive experience working on Windows, Linux, systems programming, database programming, UI programming, QA development, you name it. Things would be different if all of us were brilliant system programmers but none knew how to do UI, or the other way round. I’m proud to say that inSync is a no handicap team and we strive to ensure that the product does not have any weak areas.
Python as The Programming Language
Kudos to Guido for a wonderfully intuitive language and kudos to the python team for the extensive set of modules. inSync uses C/C++ when it comes to heavy computation or interfacing with the operating system. But in both the cases, we managed to keep the C/C++ code to lower level functions. The high level logic is coded completely in python. It allowed us very fast developement of good quality, highly maintainable, cross platform code.
Don’t Reinvent, Reuse The Wheel
inSync uses Qt (PyQt) for GUI, PostgreSQL as database server and several other python modules. We picked these after extensive experimentation and analysis. We also contribute back any bug fixes and enhancements. It’s not about just reusing the wheel but choosing a good wheel and then making it better.
Please let us know if you have any feedback for the beta. Would be more than glad to take a look.
Related Posts:
- Druvaa inSync 2.0 Features Suggest For the first timers - Druvaa inSync is a Fast...
- Druvaa inSync v3 Released with 25% Introductory Discount March 11, 2009 Within 2 weeks of announcing the beta,...
- Druvaa inSync v3.0 Feature List This post is in reference to the forums discussion -...
- Six things customers love about inSync & three things they don’t As I mentioned in the last post, Druvaa acquired some...
- Druvaa inSync 3.0 Beta - Adds Search, Speed and Bare Metal Restore February 26, 2009 Druvaa announced the general availability of long...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
2 Comments Add your own
1. Tony | March 11th, 2009 at 8:01 am
Feedback for beta -
It would be nice to have the ability to sort by modified, name, etc.. on the restore screen.
Tony
2. Milind | March 16th, 2009 at 1:57 am
Thanks for the suggestion Tony. It’s late for 3.0. But we’ll certainly pick it up in one of the coming releases.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed