<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Druvaa inSync 2.0 Features Suggest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/</link>
	<description>Continuous Data Availability</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaspreet</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaspreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks Carlos,

Yes, detailed statistics is what is missing in version 1.2

You have a very good input, this holds good specially when users are traveling/mobile.

Marked for version 2.0

- J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Carlos,</p>
<p>Yes, detailed statistics is what is missing in version 1.2</p>
<p>You have a very good input, this holds good specially when users are traveling/mobile.</p>
<p>Marked for version 2.0</p>
<p>- J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Franco</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[Posted on behalf of Carlos]

I have a new question, which is related to my work as IT manager.

 I would like to know how much data is been synchronized by clients over the time; How often are clients being synchronizing their computers (so I can warn the user that there is a problem with his synchronization schedule); and other useful information…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Posted on behalf of Carlos]</p>
<p>I have a new question, which is related to my work as IT manager.</p>
<p> I would like to know how much data is been synchronized by clients over the time; How often are clients being synchronizing their computers (so I can warn the user that there is a problem with his synchronization schedule); and other useful information…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaspreet</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaspreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>About simplicity, yup we are very clear on not making the GUI complected after all these features.

@chris
SIS (single instance store) would be completely invisible to the end user. And will have no external dependency of any database/file-system/storage etc.

Interestingly, we can see perf. improvements after adding SIS functionalities. Mainly because of reduced read/writes.

@nishant, 
thanks for the input. We also felt the same, and have dropped "theft protection" from next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About simplicity, yup we are very clear on not making the GUI complected after all these features.</p>
<p>@chris<br />
SIS (single instance store) would be completely invisible to the end user. And will have no external dependency of any database/file-system/storage etc.</p>
<p>Interestingly, we can see perf. improvements after adding SIS functionalities. Mainly because of reduced read/writes.</p>
<p>@nishant,<br />
thanks for the input. We also felt the same, and have dropped &#8220;theft protection&#8221; from next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishat</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>For anyone with installation size more than 100/200 single instance and user profiles would be a must have feature. All depends how simple can you keep all these advance features.

Advise (Free): Don't compete on features, big companies do that. Try and give something unique, killer and usable.

Although ver 1.x is very simple to use, some work still needs to be done on GUI side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone with installation size more than 100/200 single instance and user profiles would be a must have feature. All depends how simple can you keep all these advance features.</p>
<p>Advise (Free): Don&#8217;t compete on features, big companies do that. Try and give something unique, killer and usable.</p>
<p>Although ver 1.x is very simple to use, some work still needs to be done on GUI side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Interesting features,

one thing i liked about inSync 1.x was its simplicity and would like to see the same despite all these features.

I worked with a product which has single instance store, it was painful both in installation/dependencies and performance. Hopefully you will take care of these issues.

- C
PS: Thanks for the free SOHO model</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting features,</p>
<p>one thing i liked about inSync 1.x was its simplicity and would like to see the same despite all these features.</p>
<p>I worked with a product which has single instance store, it was painful both in installation/dependencies and performance. Hopefully you will take care of these issues.</p>
<p>- C<br />
PS: Thanks for the free SOHO model</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.druvaa.com/2008/03/24/druvaa-insync-20-features-suggest/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Looking at your proto presentation, the best feature which could add is "infinite file versions" in other words full backup timeline ...

You are talking of CDP here, may be thats the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at your proto presentation, the best feature which could add is &#8220;infinite file versions&#8221; in other words full backup timeline &#8230;</p>
<p>You are talking of CDP here, may be thats the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
